SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care (JIAPAC)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1545109708328538v1
8/1/52    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castelnuovo, B.
Right arrow Articles by Colebunders, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castelnuovo, B.
Right arrow Articles by Colebunders, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Three-Year Outcome Data of Second-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in Ugandan Adults: Good Virological Response but High Rate of Toxicity

Barbara Castelnuovo*, Laurence John, Fred Lutwama, Allan Ronald, Lisa A. Spacek, Michael Bates, Moses R. Kamya, and Robert Colebunders

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bcastelnuovo{at}idi.co.ug.


   Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the safety and virological response to lopinavir/ritonavir containing second-line therapy after failing a first line nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) based regimen. Design. Prospective 36 months cohort study of patients switched to zidovudine/stavudine plus didanosine plus lopinavir/ritonavir capsules as second-line regimen. Methodology. Structured interview, medical examination, and laboratory assessment performed every 6 months. Results. We enrolled 40 patients; 1 died and 3 were lost to follow-up. Median CD4+ count at baseline was 108 cell/µL, median log viral load was 4.8 copies/mL. Sixteen (40%) patients had baseline genotypic resistant test, 14 (87%) had lamivudine resistance mutations, and all had NNRTIs resistance mutations. At month 36, 82% of the patients achieved viral suppression (<400 copies/mL) and the median increase in CD4+ count was 214 cell/µL, (interquartile range: 128-295). Twenty-five patients (62%) experienced at least one adverse event. Conclusions. Our study confirms lopinavir/ritonavir-based second-line regimen but with a high rate of toxicities.

First published on December 17, 2008, doi:10.1177/1545109708328538

Journal of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care (JIAPAC) 2009;8:52.

A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement