This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1545109708315327v1 7/2/61    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Holmes, L. Articles by Essien, E. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Holmes, L., Jr Articles by Essien, E. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Racial Variance in Rationale for HIV Testing in Community-Based Setting in the United States: Evidence from the National Health Interview Survey

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: drlholmesjr{at}gmail.com.

	Abstract

Background: HIV testing varies across racial/ethnic groups in the United States, but it is unclear whether the rationale for testing differs as well racially. The authors aimed to assess the rationale for HIV testing and the racial/ethnic variation therein. Methods: Using the National Health Interview Survey 2003 (n = 29 753), the authors examined the association between rationale for HIV testing and race. Chi-square statistic and multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to test for racial differences and the effect of race/ethnicity on the rationale for HIV testing. Results: There was a statistically significant racial difference with respect to HIV testing rationale, ² (24, N = 10 481) = 808.9, P< .001. After adjustment for relevant covariates, compared with Caucasians, African Americans were 37% less likely to be tested due to exposure to sex/drugs, whereas Hispanics were not (prevalence risk ratio [PRR], 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.47-0.84, respectively). Likewise African Americans and Hispanics were less likely to be tested if they were sick or had a medical problem (PRR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.44-0.99 and PRR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.43-0.98). Conclusions: Substantial racial variation occurred in the reasons for being tested for HIV in the United States, indicative of the need to understand such rationale for effective HIV screening and testing.

First published on March 4, 2008, doi:10.1177/1545109708315327

Journal of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care (JIAPAC) 2008;7:61.

A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?